Does low budget ERP meet the expectation/demand of your business?

There will be several restrictions in terms of ERP implementation, while working with a limited budget. These limitations might not be good for further scalability. Low budget ERP may cause some crucial limitations such as gap in features, lack of compliance with functional requirements, inexperienced consultants and among others.

A minimal budget can not meet the criteria of desired implementation when it comes to customization and configuration. Developing new code for a one-of-a kind implementation needs more time and resources, as well as more people. The same work is required to configure the implementation using new tools within the application as it is to customize it. It’s challenging to work with fewer time, resources and people when you are on a tight budget. On the other hand, a low budget implies fewer tests. Testing determines whether or not your implementation is on the right track. Less testing may result in your program’s relevant mistakes not being discovered, causing more balancing issues. Then re-configuring your application will cost you more money. Also testing ensures the quality of your application.

Individual core features determine whether or not your application is preferable. A successful implementation requires significant data analysis, suitable automation, integration with the system, effective financial management and a variety of other elements. Within a short budget it is not possible to cover all of the core features. A Smaller budget favors fewers features which does not have the ability to cover the entire scope of a good execution. Every organization wants to match its consumers expectations, but with a limited budget, it will be unable to do so.

An ERP implementation’s architecture must be well organized with proper evaluation. Every written documentation of each aspect of an application is very important for an implementation. If any of this is missing, the implementation may seem poor. Minimum budget maximizes the hassle of an implementation.